Motorcycle Loan APR Calculator
This calculator estimates periodic payments, total paid and interest for motorcycle loans and compares monthly and bi‑weekly schedules. It supports APR input, down payment, trade‑in value, fees rolled into the loan, and optional extra payments per scheduled period.
Results use standard amortization math and closed‑form payoff estimates when extra payments are applied. Use the comparison view to see how switching to bi‑weekly payments or adding small extras can reduce interest and shorten payoff time.
Governance
Record e2f3fbb87ec8 • Reviewed by Fidamen Standards Committee
Compute the periodic payment, total paid and total interest for the chosen payment frequency using standard amortization formulas and the entered APR.
Inputs
Results
Payment per period
-$0.19
Number of payments
130
Total paid
-$25.00
Total interest paid
-$10,025.00
| Output | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Payment per period | -$0.19 | USD |
| Number of payments | 130 | — |
| Total paid | -$25.00 | USD |
| Total interest paid | -$10,025.00 | USD |
Visualization
Methodology
Periodic payment formulas assume a nominal APR converted to a periodic rate by dividing by payments per year, then apply the standard annuity formula to compute scheduled payment: payment = r*P / (1 - (1+r)^-N) when the rate is positive. For zero interest the payment is principal divided by number of periods.
When extra payments are added, estimated number of payments to payoff is computed from the closed‑form solution of the amortization recurrence: n = ln(payment divided by (payment minus r times principal)) / ln(1 + r), rounded up to whole periods. This provides an estimate; actual day‑count, lender rounding, or payment posting rules may change precise payoff timing.
F.A.Q.
Does the calculator compute the lender's disclosed APR?
The tool accepts your APR input and applies it as the nominal annual percentage rate divided into periodic rates. It does not compute a lender‑disclosed APR from cash flows or fees; use the loan documents for the official APR disclosure.
Are bi‑weekly payments always better?
Bi‑weekly schedules generally accelerate payoff because 26 payments per year equals 13 monthly equivalents, but the benefit depends on whether the lender applies interest using the same APR and how payments are posted. This calculator shows estimated savings but cannot guarantee lender posting practices.
How accurate are payoff time and interest savings?
Estimates use closed‑form amortization math and standard assumptions about payment posting. Actual results can differ due to lender rounding, varying compounding conventions, day count differences, missed payments, or add‑ons. See accuracy and standards section for details.
Should I use exact dates for payment schedules?
This tool uses period counts and does not model specific calendar dates, billing cycles, or grace periods. For exact payoff dates consult your lender or request an amortization schedule tied to your first payment date.
Sources & citations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — Numerical Methods and Accuracy — https://www.nist.gov
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) — Standards Catalogue — https://www.iso.org
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) — Numerical Analysis Guidance — https://www.ieee.org
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) — Risk Management and Controls (contextual standards) — https://www.osha.gov
- Consumer financial protection resources (conceptual guidance) — https://www.consumerfinance.gov
- CFPB Regulation Z — 12 CFR § 1026.22 Determination of Annual Percentage Rate — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/22/
- CFPB Appendix J — Annual Percentage Rate Computations for Closed-End Credit — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/j/
- CFPB Annual Percentage Rate Tables — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/compliance/compliance-resources/other-applicable-requirements/annual-percentage-rate-tables/
Further resources
Versioning & Change Control
Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).
Record ID: e2f3fbb87ec8What changed (latest)
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-14 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Public QA status
PASS — golden 25 + edge 120
Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23
Versioning & Change Control
Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).
What changed (latest)
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-14 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Public QA status
PASS — golden 25 + edge 120
Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23
Engine
v1.0.0
Data
Baseline (no external datasets)
Content
v1.0.0
UI
v1.0.0
Governance
Last updated: Nov 14, 2025
Reviewed by: Fidamen Standards Committee (Review board)
Credentials: Internal QA
Risk level: low
Reviewer profile (entity)
Fidamen Standards Committee
Review board
Internal QA
Entity ID: https://fidamen.com/reviewers/fidamen-standards-committee#person
Semantic versioning
- MAJOR: Calculation outputs can change for the same inputs (formula, rounding policy, assumptions).
- MINOR: New features or fields that do not change existing outputs for the same inputs.
- PATCH: Bug fixes, copy edits, or accessibility changes that do not change intended outputs except for previously incorrect cases.
Review protocol
- Verify formulas and unit definitions against primary standards or datasets.
- Run golden-case regression suite and edge-case suite.
- Record reviewer sign-off with credentials and scope.
- Document assumptions, limitations, and jurisdiction applicability.
Assumptions & limitations
- Uses exact unit definitions from the Fidamen conversion library.
- Internal calculations use double precision; display rounding follows the unit's configured decimal places.
- Not a substitute for calibrated instruments in regulated contexts.
- Jurisdiction-specific rules may require official guidance.
Change log
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-14 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Areas: engine, content, ui • Reviewer: Fidamen Standards Committee • Entry ID: db07427ba501
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/compliance/compliance-resources/other-applicable-requirements/annual-percentage-rate-tables/
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/22/
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/j/
- https://www.ieee.org
- https://www.iso.org
- https://www.nist.gov
- https://www.osha.gov
