Home Loan Interest Calculator
This calculator compares standard monthly amortization to bi‑weekly payment schedules for a home loan. Enter the loan amount, annual interest rate (APR), term in years, and any optional additional amount you plan to add to each bi‑weekly payment.
Results show the estimated monthly and bi‑weekly payment amounts, total interest paid under each schedule (using 26 bi‑weekly periods per year), estimated interest savings, total paid under a bi‑weekly schedule, and an approximate payoff time when making bi‑weekly payments including extras.
Governance
Record a6ee6d22581c • Reviewed by Fidamen Standards Committee
Inputs
Results
Estimated monthly payment (no extra)
$1,347.13
Estimated bi‑weekly payment (base + extra)
$621.48
Total interest paid with monthly payments
$184,968.26
Total interest paid with bi‑weekly payments (assumes 26 periods/year)
$184,753.30
Estimated interest saved (monthly − bi‑weekly)
$214.96
Total amount paid with bi‑weekly schedule
$484,753.30
Approximate payoff time with bi‑weekly payments (years)
—
| Output | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated monthly payment (no extra) | $1,347.13 | USD |
| Estimated bi‑weekly payment (base + extra) | $621.48 | USD |
| Total interest paid with monthly payments | $184,968.26 | USD |
| Total interest paid with bi‑weekly payments (assumes 26 periods/year) | $184,753.30 | USD |
| Estimated interest saved (monthly − bi‑weekly) | $214.96 | USD |
| Total amount paid with bi‑weekly schedule | $484,753.30 | USD |
| Approximate payoff time with bi‑weekly payments (years) | — | years |
Visualization
Methodology
Calculations use standard amortization formulas converting the annual nominal rate to the period rate (monthly = annual/12, bi‑weekly = annual/26) and the standard annuity formula for level payments. For zero interest rate the calculator uses linear repayment to avoid division by zero.
This tool provides deterministic mathematical estimates for comparison and planning. It does not account for lender-specific policies (for example, whether your lender applies bi‑weekly payments as credited halves of a monthly payment, posts payments immediately, or applies payments toward principal on receipt). Use the results for planning and discuss exact payoff timing with your lender.
F.A.Q.
Does a bi‑weekly schedule always save interest?
Generally yes when bi‑weekly payments result in an extra equivalent monthly payment each year or when additional per‑payment principal is applied. Savings depend on exact payment amount, timing, and how the lender posts payments.
Why do some calculators show different savings for the same inputs?
Differences come from modeling choices: whether bi‑weekly is treated as 26 equal payments per year, whether half‑monthly payments are used, how interest is compounded, and whether lender posting rules or prepayment penalties are modeled.
How accurate are these estimates?
Estimates use standard amortization mathematics but are approximate for real‑world payoff timing. They do not substitute for lender statements or escrow/tax/fee calculations. See accuracy caveats and standards references below.
Sources & citations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — https://www.nist.gov
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) — https://www.iso.org
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) — https://www.ieee.org
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) — https://www.osha.gov
- CFPB Regulation Z — 12 CFR § 1026.22 Determination of Annual Percentage Rate — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/22/
- CFPB Appendix J — Annual Percentage Rate Computations for Closed-End Credit — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/j/
- CFPB Annual Percentage Rate Tables — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/compliance/compliance-resources/other-applicable-requirements/annual-percentage-rate-tables/
Further resources
Versioning & Change Control
Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).
Record ID: a6ee6d22581cWhat changed (latest)
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-06 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Public QA status
PASS — golden 25 + edge 120
Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23
Versioning & Change Control
Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).
What changed (latest)
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-06 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Public QA status
PASS — golden 25 + edge 120
Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23
Engine
v1.0.0
Data
Baseline (no external datasets)
Content
v1.0.0
UI
v1.0.0
Governance
Last updated: Nov 6, 2025
Reviewed by: Fidamen Standards Committee (Review board)
Credentials: Internal QA
Risk level: low
Reviewer profile (entity)
Fidamen Standards Committee
Review board
Internal QA
Entity ID: https://fidamen.com/reviewers/fidamen-standards-committee#person
Semantic versioning
- MAJOR: Calculation outputs can change for the same inputs (formula, rounding policy, assumptions).
- MINOR: New features or fields that do not change existing outputs for the same inputs.
- PATCH: Bug fixes, copy edits, or accessibility changes that do not change intended outputs except for previously incorrect cases.
Review protocol
- Verify formulas and unit definitions against primary standards or datasets.
- Run golden-case regression suite and edge-case suite.
- Record reviewer sign-off with credentials and scope.
- Document assumptions, limitations, and jurisdiction applicability.
Assumptions & limitations
- Uses exact unit definitions from the Fidamen conversion library.
- Internal calculations use double precision; display rounding follows the unit's configured decimal places.
- Not a substitute for calibrated instruments in regulated contexts.
- Jurisdiction-specific rules may require official guidance.
Change log
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-06 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Areas: engine, content, ui • Reviewer: Fidamen Standards Committee • Entry ID: 46196ce825f4
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/compliance/compliance-resources/other-applicable-requirements/annual-percentage-rate-tables/
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/22/
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/j/
- https://www.ieee.org
- https://www.iso.org
- https://www.nist.gov
- https://www.osha.gov
