Fidamen

Beta Calculator (Stock Volatility)

This Beta Calculator estimates an asset or portfolio's sensitivity to market movements using multiple accepted methods: OLS regression (slope), direct covariance/market-variance ratio, portfolio-weighted beta, and levered/unlevered adjustments. Choose the method that matches the inputs you can reliably compute.

The tool is intended for analysis and decision support only. It provides numeric outputs alongside guidance on data quality, sample period, and model limitations so you can assess result reliability before using estimates for investment or regulatory decisions.

Updated Nov 19, 2025QA PASS — golden 25 / edge 120Run golden-edge-2026-01-23

Governance

Record 9619463b8862 • Reviewed by Fidamen Standards Committee

Estimate beta as the slope from an ordinary least squares regression of stock returns on market returns, implemented via the covariance/market variance relationship.

Inputs

Results

Updates as you type

Estimated Beta (regression)

1.25

OutputValueUnit
Estimated Beta (regression)1.25
Primary result1.25

Visualization

Methodology

OLS regression beta is computed as the slope from regressing stock returns on market returns. Numerically this equals Cov(stock, market) divided by Var(market) when both series use the same return frequency and sample.

The levered/unlevered conversion uses the standard tax-adjusted adjustment (Hamada-style): unlevered_beta = levered_beta / (1 + (1 - tax_rate) * D/E), and the reverse to relever. Use market values for equity and debt where possible.

Portfolio beta is a weighted average of constituent betas: portfolio_beta = Σ weight_i × beta_i. Ensure weights are in decimal form and that the same beta definitions (levered/unlevered) are used across holdings.

Key takeaways

Select the method that matches the data you have. For time-series-based OLS, ensure consistent return frequency and matching sample periods. For capital structure adjustments, use market-value D/E and a recent marginal tax rate.

All outputs are estimates. Validate with out-of-sample checks, multiple lookback periods, and sensitivity analysis before acting on results.

Worked examples

Example 1: Given covariance = 0.0005 and market variance = 0.0004, regression beta = 0.0005 / 0.0004 = 1.25.

Example 2: For a levered beta of 1.2, D/E = 0.5 and tax rate 21%: unlevered = 1.2 / (1 + 0.79*0.5) ≈ 0.94.

Example 3: Portfolio with weights [0.5,0.5] and betas [1.1,0.9] yields portfolio beta = 0.5*1.1 + 0.5*0.9 = 1.0.

F.A.Q.

What input frequency should I use (daily/weekly/monthly)?

Use the frequency that aligns with your intended use case. Short-term trading commonly uses daily returns; strategic allocation often uses monthly. Do not mix frequencies between stock and market series; compute covariance and variance on matching intervals.

Can I convert levered to unlevered beta when only book-value D/E is available?

You can, but market-value D/E is preferred because book values may misstate economic leverage. When using book values, document the limitation and consider a sensitivity check.

How precise are these estimates?

Precision depends on data quality, sample size, and model fit. Small samples and non-stationary return series increase uncertainty. See the accuracy caveats and recommended standards for data handling.

Should I apply Blume adjustment?

Blume adjustment reverts estimated betas toward 1 to reflect mean reversion observed empirically. Use only after verifying historical stability and understanding the intended use; an option is provided to apply this as a post-processing step.

Sources & citations

Further resources

Versioning & Change Control

Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).

Record ID: 9619463b8862

What changed (latest)

v1.0.02025-11-19MINOR

Initial publication and governance baseline.

Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.

Public QA status

PASS — golden 25 + edge 120

Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23

Engine

v1.0.0

Data

Baseline (no external datasets)

Content

v1.0.0

UI

v1.0.0

Governance

Last updated: Nov 19, 2025

Reviewed by: Fidamen Standards Committee (Review board)

Credentials: Internal QA

Risk level: low

Reviewer profile (entity)

Fidamen Standards Committee

Review board

Internal QA

Entity ID: https://fidamen.com/reviewers/fidamen-standards-committee#person

Semantic versioning

  • MAJOR: Calculation outputs can change for the same inputs (formula, rounding policy, assumptions).
  • MINOR: New features or fields that do not change existing outputs for the same inputs.
  • PATCH: Bug fixes, copy edits, or accessibility changes that do not change intended outputs except for previously incorrect cases.

Review protocol

  • Verify formulas and unit definitions against primary standards or datasets.
  • Run golden-case regression suite and edge-case suite.
  • Record reviewer sign-off with credentials and scope.
  • Document assumptions, limitations, and jurisdiction applicability.

Assumptions & limitations

  • Uses exact unit definitions from the Fidamen conversion library.
  • Internal calculations use double precision; display rounding follows the unit's configured decimal places.
  • Not a substitute for calibrated instruments in regulated contexts.
  • Jurisdiction-specific rules may require official guidance.

Change log

v1.0.02025-11-19MINOR

Initial publication and governance baseline.

Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.

Areas: engine, content, ui • Reviewer: Fidamen Standards Committee • Entry ID: ba48d3dbb33a