Convert Kelvin to Reaumur - Temperature Converter
This tool converts a temperature value given in Kelvin (K) to the Réaumur scale (°Ré). The mathematical relationship between these scales is exact; the tool performs the fixed arithmetic conversion and returns the corresponding Réaumur temperature.
Use this converter for quick unit conversions, verification of calculations, or integration into workflows that require Réaumur values. Note that while the numerical conversion is exact, real-world thermometer readings carry measurement uncertainty and potential bias; read the methodology and FAQs for guidance on calibration and accuracy.
Governance
Record 96ee04060437 • Reviewed by Fidamen Standards Committee
Interactive Converter
Convert between kelvin and reaumur with precision rounding.
Quick reference table
| Kelvin | Reaumur |
|---|---|
| 1 K | -217.72 °Ré |
| 5 K | -214.52 °Ré |
| 10 K | -210.52 °Ré |
| 25 K | -198.52 °Ré |
| 50 K | -178.52 °Ré |
| 100 K | -138.52 °Ré |
Methodology
The conversion uses the defined relationships between Kelvin, Celsius, and Réaumur. Kelvin is an absolute thermodynamic scale where 0 K is absolute zero. Réaumur is a historic scale linked to the Celsius scale by a simple linear factor.
Mathematically the conversion is exact and requires no empirical coefficients. However, when converting measured temperatures (from sensors or instruments) you should account for instrument uncertainty, calibration status, and environmental effects. For traceable measurements, follow calibration and uncertainty practices described by NIST, ISO/IEC 17025, and relevant instrument manufacturer guidance.
Worked examples
Example 1: 273.15 K → (273.15 - 273.15) × 0.8 = 0.00 °Ré (freezing point of water).
Example 2: 373.15 K → (373.15 - 273.15) × 0.8 = 80.00 °Ré (boiling point of water at standard pressure).
Example 3: 300 K → (300 - 273.15) × 0.8 = 21.48 °Ré.
F.A.Q.
Is the conversion exact?
Yes. The mathematical relationship between Kelvin, Celsius, and Réaumur is exact: °Ré = (K - 273.15) × 4/5. Any numerical difference arises from rounding or from uncertainty in the original measured temperature.
Do I need to calibrate my thermometer before converting?
Calibrate instruments according to manufacturer recommendations and accepted standards if you need traceable measurements. Conversion does not remove sensor bias or drift. For traceability and documented uncertainty, use calibration services accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or national metrology laboratories that provide references to NIST or equivalent.
How should I handle uncertainty?
Report the converted value together with the measurement uncertainty of the original Kelvin reading. Propagate uncertainty through the linear transformation (multiplying uncertainty by 0.8 for Celsius→Réaumur). For formal uncertainty analysis follow the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and relevant NIST/ISO guidance.
Are Réaumur temperatures used in modern practice?
Réaumur is largely historical and rarely used in modern scientific or industrial practice, where Celsius and Kelvin dominate. Use Réaumur only where legacy documents or local conventions require it, and ensure units and tolerances are clearly stated.
Sources & citations
- NIST - Temperature and Thermometry — https://www.nist.gov/pml/thermometry
- ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories — https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html
- BIPM - The International System of Units (SI Brochure) — https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure
- OSHA - Heat Illness Prevention and Workplace Temperature Guidance — https://www.osha.gov/heat-exposure
- Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) — https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides
- ISO 80000-5:2019 — Thermodynamics — https://www.iso.org/standard/64976.html
- NIST SP 330 — The International System of Units (SI) — https://www.nist.gov/pml/special-publication-330
Further resources
Related tools
External guidance
Versioning & Change Control
Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).
Record ID: 96ee04060437What changed (latest)
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-28 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Public QA status
PASS — golden 25 + edge 120
Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23
Versioning & Change Control
Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).
What changed (latest)
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-28 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Public QA status
PASS — golden 25 + edge 120
Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23
Engine
v1.0.0
Data
Baseline (no external datasets)
Content
v1.0.0
UI
v1.0.0
Governance
Last updated: Nov 28, 2025
Reviewed by: Fidamen Standards Committee (Review board)
Credentials: Internal QA
Risk level: low
Reviewer profile (entity)
Fidamen Standards Committee
Review board
Internal QA
Entity ID: https://fidamen.com/reviewers/fidamen-standards-committee#person
Semantic versioning
- MAJOR: Calculation outputs can change for the same inputs (formula, rounding policy, assumptions).
- MINOR: New features or fields that do not change existing outputs for the same inputs.
- PATCH: Bug fixes, copy edits, or accessibility changes that do not change intended outputs except for previously incorrect cases.
Review protocol
- Verify formulas and unit definitions against primary standards or datasets.
- Run golden-case regression suite and edge-case suite.
- Record reviewer sign-off with credentials and scope.
- Document assumptions, limitations, and jurisdiction applicability.
Assumptions & limitations
- Uses exact unit definitions from the Fidamen conversion library.
- Internal calculations use double precision; display rounding follows the unit's configured decimal places.
- Not a substitute for calibrated instruments in regulated contexts.
- Jurisdiction-specific rules may require official guidance.
Change log
v1.0.0 • 2025-11-28 • MINOR
Initial publication and governance baseline.
Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.
Areas: engine, content, ui • Reviewer: Fidamen Standards Committee • Entry ID: e539062c6282
