Fidamen

Concrete Slab Volume Calculator

Use this estimator to calculate the concrete volume needed for a slab and to approximate material counts and cost. Enter length and width in feet and slab thickness in inches; the tool applies a user-configurable waste allowance to support ordering and planning.

Outputs include cubic feet, cubic yards, and cubic meters, with optional bag-count approximations for 60 lb and 80 lb premixed bags, an estimated in-place weight, and a cost estimate per cubic yard. These approximations use standard engineering conventions for planning—final ordering should reference ready-mix supplier tickets and project specifications.

Updated Nov 30, 2025QA PASS — golden 25 / edge 120Run golden-edge-2026-01-23

Governance

Record fff2262bac1f • Reviewed by Fidamen Standards Committee

Inputs

Results

Updates as you type

Volume (cubic feet)

36.6667

Volume (cubic yards)

1.358

Volume (cubic meters)

1.0383

60 lb bags (approx.)

81.4815

80 lb bags (approx.)

61.1111

Estimated weight (pounds)

5,500

Approximate concrete cost

$169.75

OutputValueUnit
Volume (cubic feet)36.6667ft³
Volume (cubic yards)1.358yd³
Volume (cubic meters)1.0383
60 lb bags (approx.)81.4815bags
80 lb bags (approx.)61.1111bags
Estimated weight (pounds)5,500lb
Approximate concrete cost$169.75USD
Primary result36.6667

Visualization

Methodology

Volume calculation follows standard geometric volume: area × thickness, using inches → feet conversion for slab thickness. Waste allowance multiplies the computed volume by (1 + waste_percentage / 100).

Bag counts are approximated from typical bag yields (60 lb ≈ 0.45 ft³; 80 lb ≈ 0.6 ft³). Estimated weight uses a common nominal unit weight for normal-weight concrete of 150 lb/ft³; individual mixes or lightweight mixes will vary.

Cost is estimated by multiplying cubic yards by the user-provided cost per cubic yard. For project procurement, confirm final quantity and price with suppliers and factor delivery minimums and slumps per specification (see ACI/ASTM references below).

F.A.Q.

How accurate are bag-count estimates?

Bag-count outputs use typical bag yields (60 lb ≈ 0.45 ft³; 80 lb ≈ 0.6 ft³). These are approximate; actual yield varies by mixing water, compaction, and batch accuracy. For critical pours use volume in cubic yards or meters and consult supplier yields or mix design.

Why does the tool use 150 lb/ft³ for weight?

150 lb/ft³ is a widely used nominal unit weight for normal-weight concrete and is suitable for planning. Actual unit weight depends on aggregate type and moisture; consult project specifications or material data sheets for precise structural calculations.

How should I choose waste allowance?

Typical waste allowances range from 5% for small, controlled pours up to 15% for complex forms or variable site conditions. Recommended practice: 5–10% for simple slabs, 10–15% for irregular shapes or when pumping/placement waste is expected.

Can I rely on the cost estimate for bidding?

This cost is a planning-level estimate using the entered cost per cubic yard. It does not include delivery minimums, admixtures, finishing labor, reinforcement, formwork, or disposal. Use supplier quotes and project cost breakdowns for bids.

What factors require adjustment beyond this tool?

Adjust for reinforcing steel, structural toppings, subbase compaction, pump waste, slump and admixtures, temperature or cold-weather measures, and safety/inspection requirements. Structural design decisions should reference ACI codes and an engineer of record.

Sources & citations

Further resources

Versioning & Change Control

Audit record (versions, QA runs, reviewer sign-off, and evidence).

Record ID: fff2262bac1f

What changed (latest)

v1.0.02025-11-30MINOR

Initial publication and governance baseline.

Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.

Public QA status

PASS — golden 25 + edge 120

Last run: 2026-01-23 • Run: golden-edge-2026-01-23

Engine

v1.0.0

Data

Baseline (no external datasets)

Content

v1.0.0

UI

v1.0.0

Governance

Last updated: Nov 30, 2025

Reviewed by: Fidamen Standards Committee (Review board)

Credentials: Internal QA

Risk level: low

Reviewer profile (entity)

Fidamen Standards Committee

Review board

Internal QA

Entity ID: https://fidamen.com/reviewers/fidamen-standards-committee#person

Semantic versioning

  • MAJOR: Calculation outputs can change for the same inputs (formula, rounding policy, assumptions).
  • MINOR: New features or fields that do not change existing outputs for the same inputs.
  • PATCH: Bug fixes, copy edits, or accessibility changes that do not change intended outputs except for previously incorrect cases.

Review protocol

  • Verify formulas and unit definitions against primary standards or datasets.
  • Run golden-case regression suite and edge-case suite.
  • Record reviewer sign-off with credentials and scope.
  • Document assumptions, limitations, and jurisdiction applicability.

Assumptions & limitations

  • Uses exact unit definitions from the Fidamen conversion library.
  • Internal calculations use double precision; display rounding follows the unit's configured decimal places.
  • Not a substitute for calibrated instruments in regulated contexts.
  • Jurisdiction-specific rules may require official guidance.

Change log

v1.0.02025-11-30MINOR

Initial publication and governance baseline.

Why: Published with reviewed formulas, unit definitions, and UX controls.

Areas: engine, content, ui • Reviewer: Fidamen Standards Committee • Entry ID: 204cb07d150b